📌  相关文章
📜  客户端对您的 Cloud Firestore 数据库的访问权限已过期编辑规则 - 无论代码示例

📅  最后修改于: 2022-03-11 15:00:52.944000             🧑  作者: Mango

代码示例1
The security rules shown here are a departure from the previous default rules that were much more permissive. The idea with this rule:

match /{document=**} {
  allow read, write: if request.time < timestamp.date(2019, 12, 14);
}
Is that you get unrestricted access to your Firestore database up until the given date, in order to freely experiment with it for a month. However, allowing unrestricted access is obviously a massive security hole in the long run.

The recommended course of action is to first remove this rule entirely as it allows anyone to read and write anything in your database. Then, devise some proper rules that allow only access to collections and documents that your eventual users should be able to access. A full discussion of that is off-topic for Stack Overflow (as we don't know your app's requirements), but here are some good places to start learning about security rules:

The documentation
This video series
What you should be doing is calling out the access constraints for each collection and subcollection in your database. Ideally, you should lock down unauthenticated write access to all collections, except where absolutely required. In the best case, you're using Firebase Authentication to help control access to documents only as required for authenticated users.

Alternatively, if you're done working with the database (for the time being), you can block access to the database from web and mobile client entirely by using the following rule exclusively:

rules_version = '2';
service cloud.firestore {
  match /databases/{database}/documents {
    allow read, write: if false;
  }
}
With this rule, access from backend code using the Firebase Admin SDK or other Cloud SDKs will still be allowed.