📅  最后修改于: 2023-12-03 14:58:59.753000             🧑  作者: Mango
In this guide, we will discuss the problem of finding the minimum possible value of the expression (i * j) % 2019, where i and j are integers. This problem is often encountered in competitive programming or algorithmic contests.
Given the expression (i * j) % 2019, we want to find the minimum possible value of the expression. The input consists of two integers i and j.
To find the minimum possible value of the expression (i * j) % 2019, we need to consider the divisors of 2019.
2019 can be factored into prime factors as 3 * 673.
Now, let's consider four cases based on the values of i and j:
In this case, (i * j) % 2019 will be 0 as one of the numbers is divisible by 3. Therefore, the minimum possible value is 0.
In this case, (i * j) % 2019 will be equal to (i * j) % 673, as 2019 is a multiple of 673. Therefore, the minimum possible value is (i * j) % 673.
In this case, (i * j) % 2019 will also be 0 as both i and j are divisible by 3 and 673. Therefore, the minimum possible value is 0.
In this case, we need to consider the values of i * j % 3 and i * j % 673 separately. We can then find the minimum possible value by finding the smallest non-zero remainder for both cases.
Here's a pseudocode representation of the algorithm:
function findMinimum(i, j):
if i % 3 == 0 or j % 3 == 0:
return 0
else if i % 673 == 0 or j % 673 == 0:
return (i * j) % 673
else:
minRemainder = 2019
for k = 1 to 2018:
remainder = (i * j) % 2019
if remainder != 0:
minRemainder = min(minRemainder, remainder)
i++
j++
return minRemainder
The complexity of this approach is O(2019) because we iterate through all possible values of i and j. However, since 2019 is a relatively small number, the algorithm runs in a reasonable amount of time.
In this guide, we discussed the problem of finding the minimum possible value of the expression (i * j) % 2019. We analyzed different cases based on the values of i and j and provided a solution using pseudocode. By considering the prime factors of 2019, we were able to find the minimum possible value efficiently.