📅  最后修改于: 2021-01-02 05:36:02             🧑  作者: Mango
Flutter和Ionic是用于为iOS和Android平台构建移动应用程序的两种领先技术。它们使开发人员可以使用一种编程语言和单一代码库快速为移动,Web和桌面上的应用程序制作原型并发布它们。这两个框架都有其好处,因此组织的更好选择取决于特定的要求和目标。在本节中,我们将基于各种参数比较Flutter和Ionic框架之间的差异。在进行比较之前,我们将简要讨论这些技术。
是一个跨平台的UI工具包,它使我们能够使用Dart编程语言为移动,Web和桌面创建快速,美观,本地编译的应用程序。它使用一种编程语言和单个代码库构建应用程序。它是免费和开源的。 Google最初于2017年5月开发了它,现在通过ECMA标准进行管理。它是提供卓越的原生体验的一种日益普及的技术。
Google引入了它作为SDK(软件开发工具包)来创建适用于iOS和,iOS上的Objective C和Swift集成在一起。
以下列出了Flutter技术的优点:
以下列出了Flutter技术的缺点:
JavaScript等Web技术构建高质量的移动,桌面和渐进式Web应用程序。它具有一次构建即可在任何地方运行的功能。它由Drifty Co.的Max Lynch,Ben Sperry和Adam Bradley于2013年创建。 Ionic框架的第一个beta版本于2014年3月发布。
它主要侧重于前端用户体验或UI交互,可处理我们应用程序的所有外观。它易于学习,并且可以与其他库或框架(例如Cordova等)集成。它也可以不使用简单脚本include的前端框架而独立使用。
下面列出了Ionic框架的优点:
下面列出了Ionic框架的缺点:
下面的比较表解释了Flutter和Ionic之间的主要区别:
Parameters | Flutter | Ionic |
---|---|---|
Developed By | It was first introduced by Google. | It was created by Max Lynch, Ben Sperry, and Adam Bradley. |
Release | May 2017 | March 2014 |
Language | It uses Dart programming to build mobile apps. | It uses web technologies such as CSS, HTML, and JavaScript for creating applications. |
Runtime | It will run by Custom Graphics Engine. | It runs in a Web browser. |
Performance | Its performance is amazing because it uses Dart programming, and there is no need to use JavaScript Bridge for starting interactions with the app. | Its performance is slow because it uses web technologies for rendering an application. This approach decreases the speed of our application. |
Learning Curve | In Flutter, developers must have to learn Dart programming to build an app. | It has an easy learning curve because of web technologies. |
Documentation | It has well organized and more informative documentation where we can get everything that we want in one place. | It also provides well-structured documentation to the developers. Since it is in the development phase, its libraries can be changed at any time. |
Community Support | Flutter is a new technology, so it does not have strong community support. However, it is advertised by Google; therefore, it would be very popular in the coming year. | It has huge community support and a great marketplace. |
Hot Reload | Support | Support |
User Interface | Flutter has an excellent user interface in comparison to Ionic. | Its user interface is not good because it renders everything in HTML and CSS. |
UI Elements | Widgets | Web Components |
Native API Access | Native plugin library by using Flutter native packages | Native plugin library by using Cordova and Capacitor |
Mobile Performance | Excellent | Good |
Web Performance | Poor | Excellent |
Pricing | It is entirely free to utilize Flutter system technologies and their libraries. | It is free but offers a paid Pro Development Environment that accelerates the development process. |
Deployment Options | It can deploy on Mobile, Desktop, and Web. | It can deploy on Mobile, Desktop, Web as well as PWA. |
Popular Apps | Hamilton, Google Ads, Alibaba, Cryptograph, etc. | JustWatch, Pacifica, Nationwide, etc. |