📜  门|门CS 2010 |第 65 题

📅  最后修改于: 2021-09-26 03:05:32             🧑  作者: Mango

让 L1 成为递归语言。令 L2 和 L3 是可递归枚举但不可递归的语言。以下哪项陈述不一定正确?
(A) L2 – L1 是可递归枚举的。
(B) L1 – L3 是可递归枚举的
(C) L2 ∩ L1 是递归可枚举的
(D) L2 ∪ L1 是递归可枚举的
(一) A
(乙)
(C)
(四)答案:(乙)
解释:

A) Always True
(Recursively enumerable - Recursive ) is 
Recursively enumerable

B) Not always true
L1 - L3 = L1 intersection ( Complement L3 )
L1 is recursive , L3 is recursively enumerable 
but not recursive Recursively enumerable languages
are NOT closed under complement.

C) and D) Always true Recursively enumerable languages 
are closed under intersection and union. 

这个问题的测验